• Peter Niesen (Hamburg University) 
• 일시: 2024년 10월 22일 화요일 오후 6시 30분-8시 30분
• 장소: 우석경제관 504호

The “political turn” in human-animal-studies has been an inspiration to many authors working in the field, but philosophically and politically speaking a halfway house. Its main proponents have suggested animals should be awarded membership rights, but have at the same time defended a moral and non-relational understanding of basic animal rights (Donaldson/Kymlicka 2011, Cochrane 2018, Ladwig 2020). A more thorough-going relational approach for at least those animals that are inextricably connected to interspecies habitations, practices and ways of life is called for to make the political turn both theoretically more consistent and politically more attractive. I argue that such a freestanding approach is to recognize civil, social and political rights entailed by or derived from animals’ inclusion in social and political practices. For such purposes, the political theory of citizenship has offered a criterion of inclusion for resident humans: the “all subjected”-principle. Among the several variants proposed, I discuss how a revised version of the principle needs to be framed in order to cover animal political membership. This is then argued not to generate full political equality for animals, but more modest claims to representation in law-making. 

이 행사는 발표 논문 사전회람(pre-read) 형식으로 진행됩니다. 참가를 희망하는 분들은 politicaltheory@snu.ac.kr로 신청 바랍니다.

• 참가신청 및 문의 politicaltheory@snu.ac.kr
• 공동주최: 서울대학교 한국정치연구소

[서울대학교 정치사상워크숍]
[SNU Political Theory Workshop]

Democracy without Shortcuts:
Rescuing Democracy from Populism and Technocracy

Cristina Lafont (Northwestern University) Harold H. and Virginia Anderson Professor of Philosophy

• 일시: 2024년 5월 28일 화요일 오후 6:30 ~ 8:30
• 장소: 서울대학교 사회과학대학 (16동) 교수회의실 (312호)ﾠ

The current crisis of democracy fuels the impression that democratic societies are stuck between populism and technocracy, between the rule of experts and mob rule. For all their differences, populism and technocracy are equally incompatible with democracy. Contrary to the democratic commitment to give all citizens an equal say in political decisions, populism and technocracy expect citizens to blindly defer to the decisions of others. In this time of crisis, it is therefore crucial to defend the possibility of genuine democracy against the sort of exclusions involved in populism and technocracy. Unfortunately, many popular conceptions of democracy tacitly rely on populist or technocratic assumptions that threaten the democratic ideal of inclusion. I justify this claim in two steps. First, I analyze deep pluralist, epistocratic, and lottocratic conceptions of democracy. I show that each of these conceptions offers institutional “shortcuts” in an attempt to solve well-known problems of democratic governance such as overcoming disagreements, citizens’ political ignorance, or poor-quality deliberation. However, instead of actually addressing the problems, the proffered solutions end up simply expecting citizens to blindly defer to actors over whose decisions they cannot exercise democratic control. Herein lies their anti-democratic core. In a second step, I analyze the roots of the requirement for blind deference in each of these conceptions. I show that deep pluralist conceptions justify the requirement of blind deference on populist grounds, epistocratic conceptions justify it on technocratic grounds, and lottocratic conceptions justify it on technopopulist grounds. I contend that democratic theorists and practitioners won’t contribute to democratic improvements unless they recognize and reject these sorts of latent technocratic and populist assumptions. To illustrate this claim, I focus on current efforts to design and organize citizens’ assemblies and other deliberative minipublics. These new forms of citizen participation offer promising venues for democratization. However, they may have a positive or a negative impact upon democracy. It all depends upon whether they are designed in line with technocratic, populist or genuine democratic aims.

• 참가신청 및 문의: politicaltheory@snu.ac.kr
• 공동주최: 서울대학교 정치외교학부 10-10 사업단